Oh Awesome. thanks for digging up that description for me. Hmm, hag like not troll like. Man, my memory for these details is never as good as I think it is! lol, which sort of brings me back to main point. There's little point saying she's 'canonically' something when there's such room for interpretation. I'm mentally putting fat Millicent firmly in my fanon column but I'm pernickety about such things. I totally think you're right about fandom wanting unmodel like representation.
I definitely get what you're saying regarding Snarry and it#s all points of view right? Though I do recall in my first fanfic I went to great lengths to reinterpret 'face like a pug' to be a good thing. lol. And of course there's always the option of saying they grew into features that didn't suit them as a child.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2015-03-24 09:01 am (UTC)I definitely get what you're saying regarding Snarry and it#s all points of view right? Though I do recall in my first fanfic I went to great lengths to reinterpret 'face like a pug' to be a good thing. lol. And of course there's always the option of saying they grew into features that didn't suit them as a child.